Since the turnaround in energy this year, I’ve been reestablishing contact with my associated deities. Of course Djehuty is one of them, he was around before I got formally into Kemeticism, and then showed up at my KO divination as a beloved. That’s not surprising because writing and thinking too much about things have long been habits of mine.
I talked to him about how my belief in, well everything, has been waning, especially this last year, especially in winter. It’s hard to get around that analytical voice in my head that seems to want to counter everything. Now, if it seems contradictory that I’m having a conversation in my head with a god about how I’m not sure that he’s real, well, that’s just how I roll.
Then I realized that being overly analytical was squarely in long-beak’s domain. So, I asked him how I might solve the issue. How do I find my way through this maze? It had already become apparent, just from a practical, mental health standpoint, that I need belief to keep me healthy. I’ve tried it both ways, with and without, and with is definitely better for me. Nihilism is not good for my soul.
He told me to “walk between the raindrops” while giving me a visual of a model of atoms with wide spaces between them. In other words, the world is not as solid as it appears. Science is not an all-knowing monolith. There are wide gaps in understanding there too.
I told him that idea was great in theory, but I’m currently inhabiting a body made from atoms and they may not be solid, but they sure as heck act like it. And while there’s technically nothing stopping me from walking between raindrops, it is a practical impossibility. When it rains, I get wet. As you can tell, I wasn’t terribly impressed with his answer. I almost accused him of using the word “quantum” out of context.
The next morning, I was reading a science article about how certain people were questioning a theory that had previously been thought to be pretty solid, but there were some anomalies that made them question it. They set up simulations and decided that if they measured a seemingly unrelated thing and got a certain answer, then it would support their hypothesis and call the other theory into question. Djehuty, of course, was reading over my should and saying “See? What did I tell you?”
I took that to mean that I might find answers while examining seemingly unrelated incidents. Science is not about proving that the world is a certain way. It’s about recording observations, and a single, though repeatable, observation can turn accepted thought on its head at any time. Don’t ignore the anomalies, pursue them. But don’t cover them with fluff either. Don’t lose track of the analysis in order to improvise, or at the very least, try to recognize when you’ve started to do so.
I opened my journal and got started on the maze. I wrote down the different anomalies I could think of, things like those extra short glimpses of the future, very occasionally hearing others’ thoughts, tarot cards making more sense than random chance should allow, and a few others. These things are not provable to the world at large. They’re things that I’ve experienced and have a reasonable confidence in. I’m not solving this maze for the whole world, just for myself. Your list of anomalies would probably look different from mine, and would probably lead you to different ideas. The plan is to go through each one and ask, what does this imply? What kind of Universe do we live in if this is something that happens?
That precognition one is loaded with stuff. Does it prove the existence of gods? Not really, but it does partially indicate the existence of the soul. Some part of my consciousness jumped forward in the time stream and then jumped back. My physical body didn’t do that, so it had to have been something else. Everything outwardly was the same, down to small details. This leads to questions of predestination. I know people hate that concept, but here we are. Although, from what I remember, my thought processes weren’t identical when seeing it the first time and then again the second time. That indicates that my thought processes are not predetermined, or otherwise exist outside of the “simulation.” Simulation? Experience? Movie? Time stream? I wasn’t able to change anything that happened in mine, but I have heard others report being able to do so. As you can see, there is a lot to unpack here, just for this one example. I could spend a long time going through that list and following up on the side questions as they come.
As you can see, the maze is huge and there’s no guarantee what you will find in there. Everything is labeled with question marks, as they should be. It would defeat the purpose to grab one of those question marks and declare it as Truth with a capital T. It’s the journey, not the destination, as they say. The thing is not going to be solved any time soon, but it will give that analytical side something else to think about.